Hi Tim,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tim Visher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 2. While I would very much expect the type test (coll? seq?) to return
> false on a string, I would _not_ expect the capability test
> (sequential?) to return false, and it does for a String. Is this the
> expected behavior? I would think that any seqable would return true
> for sequential?. What do we think?
sequential? is a type predicate also. This probably works as expected in
CLJS
using protocols.
Every Seqable is not Sequential.
(sequential? {:a 1}) => false
Thanks,
Ambrose
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
