Hi Zack I don't really know enough about core.logic to comment on this. Brent mentions symbolic math and it sounds neat but I'm more interested in numerical solutions at the moment.
Cheers On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:45:09 AM UTC+10, Brent Millare wrote: > > I originally assumed core.logic would be the key to symbolic math, but now > I feel that's not really the case. You still need to implement all the > algebra manipulation algorithms as usual. One can define the numbers in a > different way as Ambrose did in his talk, but I imagine we would need to > have much different performance expectations when performing the other > symbolic operations. That being said, I would like to see more work going > into that type of implementation. > > On Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:37:57 PM UTC-4, Zack Maril wrote: >> >> Off topic: >> How hard would it be to build on >> core.logic<https://github.com/clojure/core.logic#corelogic>to do math >> functions? >> -Zack >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
