I've never done this w/ clojure but in my last job when we were using
Gemstone Smalltalk, I made live code changes on a fairly regular basis.
Get the quick fix out. Do the complete release cycle later. It was only a
difference of 25 minutes, but often worth it.
Not for the faint of heart. I felt a little better doing it in Gemstone
because it was transaction based and I had to commit all my code changes.
A wee bit of a net that was.
-Sean-
On Thursday, May 24, 2012, blais wrote:
> Hi,
> Just curious...
> Is it common for people deploying Clojure servers in a production
> environment to leave a swank or nrepl server running for making live bug
> fixes? Do you guys do this? Would you advise against it?
> Thanks,
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> clojure@googlegroups.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'clojure@googlegroups.com');>
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
