On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:04 AM, nicolas.o...@gmail.com < nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And then you need to include everything accessing the internal state of > your data structures in a big deftype with little possibility of reuse. Access internal state? > For example, the earlier hash example cannot be put as an extension. > Why should most extensions manipulate mutable fields? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en