Probably out of scope. But this is easy to do w/ core.logic.

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, David McNeil <mcneil.da...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Friday, May 18, 2012 9:59:40 AM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>>
>> It sounds like you're describing searching for a pattern?
>>
>
> Yes, I think that sounds right. I am not sure how that fits into the
> core.match picture.
>
> Thanks.
> -David McNeil
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to