> Ill agree that it may be approriate for map? to return false as it does > perhaps imply a stricter contract then the jvm versions namely immutability. > However, I fully expected the return type of keywordize to be a new immutable > clojure map and it would be extreamly helpful if walk, hash-map, first, next, > rest supported map$entry. IMHO one of the best things about clojure is that > it is very easy to interop with jvm libraries without a lot of type > conversion and/or wrapper types.
Patch improving walk *definitely* welcome. This has bitten me before too. If you take this on, you may want to look at (or use) EqualityPartition in clojure.data, which attempts to categorize collections. Stuart Halloway Clojure/core http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
