On 20 April 2012 01:43, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > On Apr 19, 4:06 pm, James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com> wrote: >> On 19 April 2012 19:46, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant >> >> <abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I've been doing some thinking about the treatment of nil in a >> > statically typed version of Clojure. >> >> Statically typed in what way? Java's type system doesn't seem >> particularly suited to a functional programming language like Clojure. > > There's nothing about functional programming that precludes static > typing.
I didn't say it did. I said **Java's** type system doesn't seem suited to a functional programming language. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
