On 20 April 2012 07:08, Matthew Phillips <mattp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've always liked the way assoc and dissoc return the original map > instance when there's no change to be made. But this is not apparently > true of records. e.g.:
Out of curiosity, why is this useful to you? I would imagine that the fact that it works like that for maps at the moment is an implementation detail that you shouldn't rely upon. dissoc[iate]. Returns a new map of the same (hashed/sorted) type, that does not contain a mapping for key(s). -- David Jagoe davidja...@gmail.com +447535268218 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
