On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> OK, I ran the same test directly in the browser with optimizations. I > wasn't doing it in a REPL, so I couldn't use the time function, but Firefox > appeared to take about 2 seconds, and Chrome was definitely under a > second. So yes, there does seem to be a world of difference from Rhino. > > I'm still seeing extraordinarily slow times on problems where more > laziness is involved. It really seems that Clojurescript is evaluating > more of the lazy structure than it needs to. Any idea why that might be? Browsers have decent profiling tools. Use them and let us know what's slow. There are many, many areas of ClojureScript that need performance work. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
