>
> So, what does all this mean?
>
> 1. This is not a Clojure behavior but a Java one. Somehow millions of Java
> developers and projects
> managed to get by with this weird behavior.
>
I am not sure what you mean here:
Boolean b = new Boolean(false);
if (b) System.out.println("true");
else System.out.println("false");
This code will print "false". So the Java behaviour is fine. The Oracle
comment is a mere efficiency issue, not a semantic issue.
> 2. This fact is documented and there are alternatives.
>
In my case the problem crept in in a very unexpected way (if you care to
read the thread, which you didnt, I think). And this is just the problem
with the Clojure semantics of Booleans. Not being able to rely on a basic
if branch is very very very bad.
> 3. You can get very far with just true and false literals, especially in
> pure Clojure programs.
>
Again, that's just what I did, and I was hit by the problem anyway. Its
funny the way people are susceptible to brain washing.
> MK
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
