On Saturday, April 7, 2012 2:24:21 PM UTC-7, r0man wrote:
>
> Why do you think it is impossible to have the same API in Clojure
> and ClojureScript?
>
For instance, hiccup.core/html and hiccup.core/h cannot live in the same
namespace in ClojureScript if hiccup.core/html is going to be a macro, and
hiccup.core/h is going to be a run-time function (which is how things are
implemented in hiccup).
Well, I guess maybe they can (I have not tested this), but then you'd end
up with ambiguities like this (in ClojureScript):
(ns example
(:use [crate.core :as crate.core])
(:use-macros [crate.core :as crate.core]))
I suppose that could be worked around by giving each alias a different
namespace, but that seems very confusing to me and I'm not even sure it
would work.
-Evan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
