> If you control the third line of: > > (defn foo [x y] > (let [z (bar y (next x))] > (println "Done in " (find-name) ".") > (* 4 z (count x)))) > > then don't you control the first?
Cedric – Unfortunately, no. The target is pre-written code that may have been created using (1) clojure.core/defn or (2) several `defxyz` kind of macros already. Injecting a macro that internally uses `find- name` is something I can do, hence this need. Shantanu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
