>
> The only redundant syntax in that list #^{} vs. ^{}. A wart in the
> language, but a clear improvement nonetheless. Thankfully Clojure is very
> conservative with breaking changes.
>
> All others serve a purpose, no matter how minor.
>
> How is this proposal (on *any* alternative set syntax) different to
> proposing :::user to be synonymous to ::user, wrt redundant syntax?
>
> Alex hit the nail on the head with the 3rd post of this thread.
>
+100 and I think (and others may agree) that should conclude this thread> > Thanks, > Ambrose > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- László Török -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
