Your point is clear and valid but isn't it a bit harsh to write the response in a tone like this? After all we are asking and answering questions here, it's not like something is going to change after one request.
BTW it is nice to hear Clojure being reliable enough in people's eyes to be used in such a serious application. On Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:17:57 PM UTC+2, Luc wrote: > > I would suggest that we introduced some klingon characters in the language, > we could then satisfy all these alien desires to change a syntax that has > been > established 4 years ago. > > We have a product driving an hospital here, your "esthetic" considerations > do not > fit in my deployment plan. This is not a toy language anymore... That era > is behind > us since Jan. 2009. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
