On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com> wrote: > That said, one of the less efficient things about the Clojure > development process is the whole CA thing. A lot of FOSS projects seem > to get by fine without erecting such a barrier to participation.
I can't think of a single large open source project that doesn't require a contributor agreement in place. Various Linux flavors: https://fossbazaar.org/content/open-source-contributor-agreements-some-examples Scala: http://www.scala-lang.org/sites/default/files/contributor_agreement.pdf Python: http://python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ Django: https://www.djangoproject.com/foundation/cla/ Node.js: http://nodejs.org/cla.html Java: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html Apache projects: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt In my search for links, I found that Groovy apparently does not require a written CA. Given all the above, this surprised me. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
