Another way to flatten nested lets and conds is to use a macro that lets you insert conditionals in your lets (vs. your suggestion of inserting lets in conds).
I wrote a let? macro that does that: https://github.com/egamble/let-else - Evan On Mar 7, 10:51 pm, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the meantime, I *strongly urge* everyone to check out Grand's flatter > cond > macro:https://github.com/cgrand/parsley/blob/master/src/net/cgrand/parsley/... > > It lets you insert lets in the middle of cond expressions (like you can > currently do with for) like: > (cond > (pos? x) 2 > :let [y (* x x)] > (> y 20) 4)) > > This totally transformed my coding style and improved the readability of my > code substantially. Highly recommended. Since it is backwards compatible, > I very much wish it were part of the core, and see no reason that it > couldn't be. > > --Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
