Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org> writes: > So basically, in java unicode escapes are replaced before parsing, > whereas in clojure any unicode escape evaluates to a character, e.g., > (\u002b 1 2) is (\+ 1 2), not (+ 1 2). > > Well, I think the clojure way is the saner one. And if you really > need to instantiate > > (defrecord इ [x]) > > as (\u0907. 1), you can add your own `with-replaced-unicode' macro and > be done.
Ups, that statement is wrong, because the reader cannot read symbols with unicode escapes, and it wouldn't work for strings like "foo\u0022 anyway. Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
