Thanks everybody. From your replies it seems like its in my best interest to just work around it .. :)
Thanks again Sunil. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Andy Fingerhut <andy.finger...@gmail.com>wrote: > Some related JIRA tickets, > > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-700 > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-757 > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-932 > > All have patches, although I don't personally know whether they are > correct fixes. > > Andy > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > > > It is the expected behavior for everyone who has ever gotten burned by > this bug :) > > > > Seriously though, this has come up several times over the last couple of > years. I remain baffled that this has never been fixed (at least not as of > 1.3). There are two ways this could potentially be fixed. On the one > hand, transients could be made to implement more of the interfaces they are > expected to implement. On the other hand, contains? could be modified to > return a meaningful error rather than false when passed something that > doesn't support that interface. Or better yet, both of these fixes would > be a good thing. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
