You could also have 1 file for inputs, and 1 file for outputs. One of the most useless things about repl's is when you go back to the saved sessions, the input and output are mixed together in an indistinguishable mess.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Linus Ericsson <oscarlinuserics...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2012/2/23 Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com> >> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, kovas boguta <kovas.bog...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > In general the way repl's handle state is pretty busted. >> > >> > Ever create a piece of data and then later wonder, how the heck did I >> > make this? >> >> One simple thing would be if the repl logged sessions to >> sequentially-numbered files. >> >> You'd be able to do a lot with just grep and a text editor to retrace >> your steps, and even to distill repl experiments down into .clj source >> files. >> > A great idea. I would also love that the source + unixtime was attached to > meta when the function was interactively inserted, since that usually isn't > that big overhead + great for checking it out later on... > > /Linus ...getting a bit excited. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
