Ah, thanks, that's a very interesting thread. To be honest I haven't
found myself in a situation where --> would be very useful, it was
more of a random thought...

On Feb 8, 4:38 pm, Baishampayan Ghose <b.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Stathis Sideris <side...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've always wondered why there isn't a "thread-in-the-middle" macro
> > (or should it be "thread-wherever"?), with special syntax to indicate
> > where to thread like so:
>
> > (--> foo
> >  (bar x _ y)
> >  (baz _ x y)
> >  (test x y _))
>
> > Should be easy to implement I guess...
>
> Oh, no. Not again!
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/clojure/6Cb8MD5EC3w
>
> Regards,
> BG
>
> --
> Baishampayan Ghose
> b.ghose at gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to