Ah, thanks, that's a very interesting thread. To be honest I haven't found myself in a situation where --> would be very useful, it was more of a random thought...
On Feb 8, 4:38 pm, Baishampayan Ghose <b.gh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Stathis Sideris <side...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've always wondered why there isn't a "thread-in-the-middle" macro > > (or should it be "thread-wherever"?), with special syntax to indicate > > where to thread like so: > > > (--> foo > > (bar x _ y) > > (baz _ x y) > > (test x y _)) > > > Should be easy to implement I guess... > > Oh, no. Not again! > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/clojure/6Cb8MD5EC3w > > Regards, > BG > > -- > Baishampayan Ghose > b.ghose at gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en