Sorry about the horrible formatting, blame google groups interface.

Max

On Jan 28, 7:16 pm, Max Penet <zcams...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello David,
> This is interesting!
> The JavaScript behavior is definitively not a good one, that said the
> only thing that I think could do more harm than good is the fact these
> checks are enabled by default. I am not sure the majority of cljs user
> will want to take a performance hit (or have to set a flag to disable
> it) on this given the fields where it will most likely be used (web
> ui, web backends), and it might not be obvious to the newcomer.
> I would rather have it disabled by default and have to (set-checked-
> arithmetic! true) to enable it. But I could be wrong, and in the end
> it is mostly a strategy decision, being convenient vs doing it right
> (fixing JS).
> Max
>
> On Jan 27, 10:03 pm, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In this 
> > branchhttps://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/compare/master...checked-ari...,
> > I've implemented one possible approach to checked arithmetic for
> > ClojureScript. In Clojure this means checking for overflow. In JavaScript a
> > much more common source of error is type coercion from the arithmetic
> > operators as well as the introduction of Infinity and NaN.
>
> > These changes would prevent the production of NaN and Infinity at least
> > from within ClojureScript itself. Also operations like:
>
> > (+ 1 2 "3")
>
> > fail instead of producing
>
> > "33"
>
> > Of course such changes would impose a performance hit. You can currently
> > toggle the behavior with the following macro:
>
> > (set-unchecked-arithmetic! true)
>
> > This is useful when writing performance sensitive code.
>
> > Feedback, improvements appreciated.
>
> > David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to