Ben Mabey <b...@benmabey.com> writes: > Am I missing something, or does the new primitive support only apply > to bound functions?
On the one hand, the docs don't mention such a restriction, but on the other hand, all examples given are always defn-defined. I tried to look into the compiler to find out, but that's not a component you understand directly. So hopefully someone with a better knowledge of the compiler's internals jumps in the discussion. Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
