Mark Engelberg <[email protected]> writes: > I believe it is a bug that: > (#{true false} false) yields false > whereas > (contains? #{true false} false) yields true > > Can someone confirm or deny this?
It's intentional that calling a set as a function returns the argument if it's a member. Part of the reason contains? exists is so that you can find out whether nil is a member of a set. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
