To clarify, I hope: in: protocols.fred.cljs ... ; define protocol Fred (defprotocol Fred (fred [this] "fred"))
In: dom.protocols.fred.cljs ; extend Fred to js/Node In: main.cljs ... (:require [protocols.fred :as f]) ; non specific version ... (f/fred a-dom-node) Now - Case 1: put all this in src and compile with cljsc Works, no problem, any compilation mode. In the compiled directories: dom.protocols.fred.js is present my conclusion - because the compiler can see the dom.protocols.fred.cljs - it can include and extend without a need for direct reference. (or... just lucky) Case 2: put dom.protocols.fred.cljs and protocols.fred.cljs in a jar put the jar in lib put main in src compile with cljsc Fails, protocol not extended to js/Node In the compiled js directories: dom.protocols.fred.js is not present Case 3: as 2, but reference dom.protocols.fred directly in main (:require [dom.protocols.fred :as _x]) Succeeds. Conclusion - when it is in a jar (as opposed to the src dir) and is not referenced directly, dom.protocols.fred.cljs is not picked up by the compiler. Questions: Is this expected behaviour? Am I doing this correctly? (Quite possibly not.) I hope this is clearer Thanks Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
