On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Brandon Harvey <sando...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to be naive, but can I ask why you folks are not using recur?
Because we're using lazy-seq instead, which ends up having a similar effect to trampoline (the "recursion" actually winds up as a succession of calls to the function inside a loop somewhere else -- with trampoline, inside trampoline, and with lazy-seq, inside whatever code eventually ends up traversing the sequence by calling next on it repeatedly. Usually, a loop inside a function like map or a macro like for, though a loop in user code could happen, e.g. (loop [s (seq foo) ...] (if s (... (recur (next s) ...) ...))). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
