Hi, passing thunks and macros are not mutually exclusive. with-bindings and with-bindings* are an example you gave yourself. I often use this style with a convenience macro and a driver function. Benefits besides the named drawbacks are reduced code size (depending on number of calls vs. class size for the additional thunk) and - in my eyes very nice - you can easily reload the driver function and all call sites see the new function without recompilation. And still have the convenience of macros.
Which way to go with macros depends on the circumstances and the corresponding trade-offs. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
