On Dec 13, 8:38 pm, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > Issue is in bean, not walk. walk calls (empty foo) on its collection, > in order to make sure you get back a collection of the same type. bean > maps are, I guess, some special type rather than an ordinary > c.l.PersistentHashMap; and that type doesn't implement the full > IPersistentCollection contract (ie, there's no implementation of > empty).
I'm not so sure this is the right way to look at the issue. clojure.walk doesn't work on records, for example, also because of a missing implementation of empty, and for records it's definitely arguable that they shouldn't support empty anyway even though they *are* a logical target for walk. Joost. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
