On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 00:08:36 +0100 Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I think that Common Lisp macros are, strictly speaking, more > > powerful than Scheme macros, but I don't have a citation. > > Let over Lambda is essentially a huge essay about why there's and will > never be anything as powerful than the CL macro system. I'd love to see an example because I digged into Scheme macros for my studies, and you can definitely break out of hygienic macros if you want to. Which seems reasonable to me, to have a safe system by default and then the ability to break out. Just like lexical and dynamic scope in Clojure. regards, Marek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
