Unfortunately, foo is not their only caller, but that's a cool technique I'm sure I'll find a use for. :)
Thanks, Jim On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Armando Blancas <abm221...@gmail.com> wrote: > If foo is their only caller, bar and baz can be locals inside foo and > thus giving baz direct access to foo's params. Checkout (letfn): > http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/1.2.0/clojure.core/letfn > > On Dec 2, 7:34 pm, Jim Crossley <j...@crossleys.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a public function foo that uses two private functions bar and baz. > > So foo calls bar which calls baz. Two of the parameters passed to foo > > aren't used by bar, only baz. > > > > Though the segregation of behavior across foo, bar, and baz makes sense > for > > my program, I feel dirty making the params required by baz a part of > bar's > > signature. > > > > Should I just get over it or is there a better way? > > > > Thanks, > > Jim > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
