2011/12/1 Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com>
> > Do I understand correct that the only way to hook
> > a recursive function without affecting other
> > threads is to annotate the function with
> > ^{:dynamic true} and call it via #'fact?
>
> If you want to you dynamic rebinding, yes.
>
> There are other possibilities, however. Maybe you could pass the function
> in as an argument. Maybe you could use 'trampoline' and *return* the
> recursive function. The point is, if you want to be able to alter something
> at runtime, see if you can do it through "ordinary" means before going to
> dynamic Vars. It will be faster and possibly easier to understand.
Thanks, Stuart. That's a good advice.
Roman.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
