Hi, the usual argument is, that this statement itself is undefined. 1 is not a collection. So it is not in the domain of the keyword (seen as a function). Keywords could throw an exception, or behave as they behave. There is no "right" solution. Just different opinions. And Rich obviously decided that they should behave as they behave. So only he can answer the question why he chose this behaviour.
Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
