Andreas, how're you doing? Frankly my impression of Clojure is just like this posting.
You know usually with Common Lisp my common sense works - it provides more than I expect. With Clojure I have to double check because my expectation is more than Clojure provides, mostly. And it ends up being using Java side - which might be more than I expect in a harsh way! (It is like doing assembly programming in C) I believe Clojure is great for Java programmers but not sure for Common Lisp programmers. But it is definitely an interesting toy! (I'm writing a toy web framework in Clojure to see how far I can go) Hope you're doing well! (PS: You shouldn't put such code into ADO production code! :-) On Nov 13, 7:55 pm, Andreas Kostler <andreas.koestler.le...@gmail.com> wrote: > How about using the clojure sequence functions? > (require '[clojure.contrib.seq-utils :as seq-utils]) > (defn last-index-of [c string] > (first (seq-utils/find-first (fn [[_ a]] (= a c)) (reverse > (seq-utils/indexed string))))) > P.S. Jong Won, how are you liking Clojure? I've met you in Parramatta > and joined the ADO team :) Nice to have you on the group here :) > Cheers > Andreas > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
