All you have to do is abstract the function you want (by 'abstract' I
mean "put it in the argument list and replace the function with the
variable"):

(defn sum2 [func incr a b]
  (if (> a b)
    0
    (+ (fn a) (sum2 func incr (incr a) b))))


You wouldn't want to use this code in the real world since it involves
non-tail recursion----something more idiomatic would be like this:

(defn sum3 [func incr a b]
  (if (> a b)
    0
    (reduce + (map func (take-while #(<= % b) (iterate incr a))))))

I admit this is not as elegant-looking; recursive functions are nearly
always more elegant!  Note I've used the short form for anonymous
functions; I could have written (fn[x] (<= x 3)) instead, but the
short form is preferable for inline functions.  (You need to rename
your function var to something other than 'fn', since that is a
Clojure keyword.)


On Oct 30, 6:48 pm, Aquahappy <joshua.ay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm watching Brian Harvey's SICP lecture #3 from Berkeley 61A/Spring
> 2011 and had a question about how I could refactor the following
> function so that the (+a 1) can be abstracted to be a function and
> passed in.
>
> Here is the original:
>
> (defn square  [x] (* x x))
>
> (defn sum [fn a b]
>   (if (> a b)
>     0
>     (+ (fn a) (sum fn (+ a 1) b))))
>
> => (sum square 2 4)
> 29
>
> That works. So then I want to replace (+ a 1) with a function like:
>
> (defn addone [a] (inc a))
>
> but I'm not sure how this would be structured.
>
> I'm new to clojure and realize this is a stepping stone to learning
> about higher order functions so apologies in advance for any code
> ugliness due to my newness to clojure.
>
> Thanks for your help!!!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to