On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:58 AM, daly <d...@axiom-developer.org> wrote: >> Have there been any new developments on the literate programming / >> Clojure front, in terms of tools that leverage existing build tools, >> test suites, generating meaningful line numbers for stack traces and >> debugging? >> > > The question is ill-posed in sense that literate programming is not > a tool or technology but a change in mindset. To quote Knuth:
I think my question is legitimate. To take an extreme example, if you tell me literate programming is great, but that I have to write out my programs by hand on paper and scan them into a computer, I'd laugh at you. Why would I want to give up the convenience of typing in my programs via keyboard to do literate programming? So I'd like an honest appraisal of the state of the art in literate programming of Clojure -- what tools and conveniences do I have to give up to do LP. Do I have to give up things like meaningful line numbers when I get an error message? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
