On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote: >> Just one more question: Is it defined behavior, or should I submit a patch >> for Clojure 1.3? >> >> Micah > > What exactly would the patch do?
The patch would pass the following test: (list (declare ^:dynamic p) (defn q [] @p)) (should= 10 (binding [p (atom 10)] (q))) Implementation: I have little experience with the Clojure code base, but I would attempt the following approaches: * fully evaluate def/declare forms as they are read, similar to the way root level (and do) forms are evaluated immediately. * figure out what changed between versions 1.2 and 1.3 that caused the behavior difference * git-bisect the Clojure repo on the above test case ??? Stu, based on your question, I'm sensing that the behavior is in the "undefined" realm…. thoughts? Micah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
