Hi guys, I fall out in many situations that I want the partial, but inversed, a simple example:
Let's say I wanna all primes bellow 2.000: (take-while (partial > 2000) primes) In this case, that's ok, but I don't expressed myself write, I because I had to use the oposite of < to create the partial, I wanna do something: (take-while (rpartial < 2000) primes) In the case of <> it's ok because they are reverse of each other, but in some circustances there is no reverse function, and you finish can't be using partial, instead you do like: (take-while #(< % 2000) primes) I mean, there is no such function on default that works as reversed arguments partial (appending partial arguments at end instead of beginning)? If it don't, is not a good idea to have one? --- Wilker LĂșcio http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio Kajabi Consultant +55 81 82556600 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en