On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Marshall T. Vandegrift <llas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I was a little worried about this when the exception behavior for fns was >> changed. I think it's solvable, but don't know right now what the solution >> is. > > I'm not incredibly experienced with Java, but would using a Java > construct which tricks the language into allowing unchecked exceptions > be too crazy? I've seen references to both of these approaches, but > haven't actually tried either for anything: > > http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2010/08/on-removing-java-checked-exceptions-by.html
seems like refactoring Reflector.java to rethrow using this approach is preferable to some wrapping/unwrapping scheme > http://projectlombok.org/features/SneakyThrows.html > > The former even came up on #clojure, I believe. > > -Marshall > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
