On Oct 10, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> What you're really looking for is pdoseq, right? Seems like futures
> might be a better building-block for this, although again Clojure's
> lack of flexibility over the thread pool could easily bite you here.

No -- I want all of the returned values, as map/pmap provides but doseq does 
not. I want what pmap does except that I want greedier use of available cores 
until all of the values are computed, at the expense of computing them in order.

 -Lee

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to