> So what's the plan for the future? Are there plans to make clojure > stable at some point so that backward compatibility can be expected? > Otherwise I am going to have difficulty continuing to advocate clojure > to my colleagues. In other words, when will the library ecosystem be > considered important enough not to break?
A key benefit of the move to modular contrib libraries is to prevent having "library ecosystem" == "monolithic hairball". > I think a statement of the policies of the Clojure/Core team (perhaps > spelled out on the website) concerning stability and backward > compatibility would really help those of us who want to be able to > rely on Clojure. The objective is the kind of stability seen across 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2. I am aware of nothing on the horizon like the numerics change, but if something important enough comes along, a decision will be made. Stuart Halloway Clojure/core http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
