On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:15, Daniel Solano Gomez <cloj...@sattvik.com> wrote: > On Wed Sep 28 18:52 2011, Daniel Pittman wrote: >> >> I have problem that I have been thrashing back and forth over the best >> design of for a week now, and I can't work out the nicest way to >> handle it. Specifically, I have a collection of functions that return >> a primary result, and might also return a secondary "annotation" about >> that result. > > Why not always return a vector? That is more or less what a tuple is.
*nod* Thanks, to you, and the other contributors. That feels like the right answer, and I guess I was hung up on not forcing a single value to be returned in a wrapper so much that I couldn't see it staring at me. Daniel -- ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
