On Sep 30, 2:58 pm, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Hank <h...@123mail.org> wrote:
> >> Would it even be idiomatic Java to always have classes full of only
> >> static methods?
> > ... the Java-ists have an idiom ("design pattern") called singleton.
> > They're not static methods but once-instance classes.
>
> Doesn't that kind of prove my point? :)Uh not sure. Let's argue about it in person in November. > And, after all, isn't the Singleton design pattern only a workaround > for the fact that languages like Java don't have a built-in construct > for creating a memoized global variable? :) http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AreDesignPatternsMissingLanguageFeatures -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
