No. Maintanable and idiomatic code weren't its goals, efficient maybe. If it did in fact produce maintainable and idiomatic code that would be an accidental byproduct. Does it?
The ClojureScript compiler was also, from what I understand, designed to produce small programs, i.e. "one web page's worth" of JavaScript code. I wouldn't assume that this easily scales up especially maintainability wise. On Sep 30, 9:45 am, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you actually looked at the ClojureScript compiler? In what way is > its design unsuitable for what you're proposing? > > David > > On Sep 29, 9:11 am, Hank <h...@123mail.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mauve has more RAM? :) > > > On Sep 29, 9:46 pm, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > ClojureScript? > > > > David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
