On Sep 27, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > Are therein lies the problem: if they are not actively maintained, > you're not going to get bug fixes even on Clojure 1.2.
I think "is it actively maintained?" is not a particularly interesting question for a community. The question is: "is this a useful library?" Then: "is the original author maintaining it?" And then, if not: "who will pick it up?" What a language community cares about is "Can I easily do X in Clojure?" For a community to grow, the answer should be "Why, yes!". That answer shouldn't depend on historical details like who first wrote a library. People matter less than code. ----- Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador Now working at http://path11.com Contract programming in Ruby and Clojure Occasional consulting on Agile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
