Sorry for my delayed reply (busy day), Andy: Ill check Medusa, the number of threads in pmap does impose a limit but in my case I can live with that.
Nathan: Yes the reason I wanted futures because of the blocking IO, I don't know why I figured out that futures are lazy, this indeed makes pmap redundant. Sean: I could use pmap, but ill be limited in number of threads still in my case I can live with that. Thank you all for clearing it out, looks like I was on the right track Ronen On Sep 22, 8:00 am, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:06 PM, ronen <nark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (defn email-approved [approved] > > (doall (pmap deref (for [req approved] (future (email-request > > req)))))) > > Wouldn't the following be close enough to what you want? > > (defn email-approved [approved] > (doall (pmap email-request approved))) > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View --http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. --http://worldsingles.com/ > Railo Technologies, Inc. --http://www.getrailo.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
