I stand corrected. I guess I'm *too* familiar with JS. I'll have to re-learn a few things.
m On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak) <m...@kotka.de>wrote: > Hi, > > Disclaimer: I haven't touched ClojureScript a single time up to now, I only > know the talk of Rich about it. Neither am I JavaScript developer. > > Too me this smells like a bug. ClojureScript is not JavaScript. It tries to > bring (where possible) Clojure semantics to the JavaScript VM. The first > version is perfectly valid Clojure and I would be very surprised if this > wouldn't work the same way in ClojureScript. If such radically different > behaviour is to be expected, then I understood something seriously wrong > about ClojureScript. > > In particular it kills sharing of "clojure only" libraries between both > target platforms. > > Sincerely > Meikel > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
