-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 20.09.2011 05:43, schrieb Sean Corfield:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Haupt
> <d.haup...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> an advantage i see is very, very concise code since you have no
>> type annotations at all. the downside is that exactly this code
>> might be unreadable - because you just have no idea what it uses
>> and what it does without tests or documentation.
> 
> I find Clojure code more readable because it is generic. Instead
> of some algorithm specialized by type, Clojure often deals with
> simpler generic algorithms that are applicable to a broader class
> of data structures which can also mean more reuse.
> 
> Writing truly generic code in the presence of a strong type system
> is often harder word and tends to produce much more dense, more
> annotated code that I find harder to understand. Take a look at
> the documentation for the Scala collection library, for example
> (I'm not dissing Scala - I like Scala, but I don't think anyone
> will disagree that the auto-generated documentation based on the
> library type signatures is very hard to read, at least for the
> "average developer").

i tend to completely ignore all non-trivial type signatures and treat
them as "what constraints are in a database". rules that prevent me
from doing things that are obviously wrong.
for scala's collection framework, that is enough. i can use it
perfectly well, i know exactly what it does - i just don't know *how*
in detail they work.

but the trivial stuff like "this parameter must support method x" or
"always returns an instance of type x" really helps.


- -- 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Rlqq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to