Am 18.09.2011 um 05:55 schrieb Ken Wesson:
>
> The easiest might be to just pass a map literal (in String form)
> through the Clojure reader. Variable integers or other simple objects
> can just be incorporated using the Java String + operator; the
> concatenation will always start with a string literal such as "{" so
> this will work in general. (It's likely keywords etc. will be constant
> while numbers might be variable.)
It's a complete mystery to me why people in the 21st century still promote
messing around with strings as FFI when an easy and simple programmatic
interface exists, which will *always* work – not only with literals the reader
understands. Not to speak about quoting hell and other gotchas.
Calling this “easiest” and “will work in general” is really a joke.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
