On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Fogus <mefo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> diagonals as neighbors.  We don't think we take advantage of the
>> flexibility anywhere in the book, so perhaps your version would indeed
>> be better.

I meant to say "I" didn't think.  Sorry, didn't mean to put words in
your mouth, Fogus.

> It was used again only briefly in section 11.2 to define the legal
> moves that a king can make in chess, which of course includes
> diagonals.  :-)

Ah, indeed.  Sorry to mislead.

--Chouser

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to