On Sep 7, 9:07 am, Stefan Kamphausen <ska2...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > yeah, maybe I should have chosen my words more wisely. I think it comes > from my CL background where you can > > (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0)) > > to achieve this behavior. Not to be nitpicking here. An Exception is > obviously 'safer' than a silent truncation and then the decision between > (silent) auto-promotion and throwing an Exception is just that: a design > decision. If you want wrapping math, you can use *unchecked-math*
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
