That's what I get for posting a question while feeding a 1-year-old child and getting ready to leave for lunch.
I was trying to put together a (for) construct to output the combinations of a set, and my logic was flawed. Here's what I really wanted [for sets of 3]: (for [m x n x o x :while (and (not= m n) (not= m o) (not= n o))] [m n o]) Maybe not the most efficient, but the smallest construct I've come up with, but it isn't generic enough for me yet. I'll keep working on it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
